<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>InVinceCable We Trust &#187; factoid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.invincecable.org.uk/category/blog/factoid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.invincecable.org.uk</link>
	<description>In times like these, it&#039;s the economy stupid. In times like these, vote for Vince Cable for Chancellor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 22:42:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Whichever way you look at it, Vince Cable&#8217;s numbers add up</title>
		<link>http://www.invincecable.org.uk/2010/04/whichever-way-you-look-at-it-vince-cables-numbers-add-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.invincecable.org.uk/2010/04/whichever-way-you-look-at-it-vince-cables-numbers-add-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[factoid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alistair Darling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chancellor of the exchequer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Osborne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrabble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vince Cable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.invincecable.org.uk/?p=585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we&#8217;ve been saying for ages &#8211; and as is now widely accepted &#8211; Vince Cable is the only realistic candidate for chancellor with the credentials to do the job. If it were a job interview in the private sector, he&#8217;d stroll into the position (Darling having been rejected for being a lawyer, Osborne for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-586" href="http://www.invincecable.org.uk/2010/04/whichever-way-you-look-at-it-vince-cables-numbers-add-up/vince-scrabble/"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-586" title="Vince Scrabble" src="http://www.invincecable.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Vince-Scrabble-400x458.jpg" alt="" width="312" height="358" /></a>As we&#8217;ve been saying for ages &#8211; and as is now widely accepted &#8211; Vince   Cable is the only realistic candidate for chancellor with the   credentials to do the job. If it were a job interview in the private   sector, he&#8217;d stroll into the position (Darling having been rejected for  being a lawyer, Osborne for not having a shred  of relevant experience).</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not only in cold, hard economic terms where Vince&#8217;s numbers   add up to the winning total. With <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8604625.stm" target="_blank">proper   nouns now being allowed in Scrabble</a> he manages to take top prize   there too.</p>
<p>&#8216;Vince Cable&#8217; will score you a tidy 19 (without any double or triple   letter or word bonuses). &#8216;Alistair Darling&#8217; and &#8216;George Osborne&#8217; &#8211;   despite both containing more letters &#8211; will only net you a miserly 17   apiece. And if you use the full &#8216;Vincent&#8217; you&#8217;ll get another couple of   points on top. A bonus we can all be happy with.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t believe us, you can check our sums on the <a href="http://www.thekatespanos.com/scrabble-score-calculator/" target="_blank">scrabble score calculator</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Ah, yes,&#8221; mutter  the smartarses, &#8220;but &#8216;Vincent&#8217; is Cable&#8217;s middle  name. His real first  name is John.&#8221;</p>
<p>OK, OK. In the interests of fair play we&#8217;ll use the candidates&#8217;  proper  full names. John Vincent Cable, Alistair Maclean Darling and  Gideon  Oliver Osborne (stop sniggering at the back&#8230;)</p>
<p>The scores  on the doors? Cable, 35. Darling 28. Osborne, 26.</p>
<p>This is starting to look like an opinion poll, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p align="left"><a target="_blank" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Whichever+way+you+look+at+it%2C+Vince+Cable%E2%80%99s+numbers+add+up+http://bit.ly/bweQ0B+#invincecable" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.invincecable.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-big1.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.invincecable.org.uk/2010/04/whichever-way-you-look-at-it-vince-cables-numbers-add-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

