The title of this post is taken directly from an article in today’s Times. It appears that online voters are representative of the 1.7m viewers of the Chancellors’ Debate given that he won the debate and accrued mostly positive ratings from the traditional media too (see our last post about the view from the US press).
However, for some reason best known to the editor of the Times article, they cut a quote from a Tweet by business and tech journalist @chrisgreen. See if you can spot the difference!

As quoted in the Times:
Iām a paid-up card-carrying member of the Conservatives. Vince Cable for Chancellor #askthechancellors.
I’m a paid-up card-carrying member of the Conservatives, but even I have to say: Vince Cable for Chancellor #invincecable #askthechancellors
Oh well, guess we’ll have to keep plugging away until the traditional media takes note.
Later today, the Twittersphere took some time to poke fun at the leader of the Conservative Party, David Cameron, who reportedly complained about the clapping from the audience to contributions from Dr. Cable.
Wow! Did he really want Krishnan to stop people clapping, to stop them from showing their appreciation? David, that’s kinda what an audience is for… kinda what they do. And this story also made the Times today: “Tories take fright from viewers’ reaction to Vince Cable in debate“.

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=7e539031-f85b-45de-86b2-8a3b9ae9e62f)
Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 England & Wales License
Recent comments